a radiohead fan site · ● est 2003
treefingers.com

News ·

American and Canadian critics mostly warm to Hail to the Thief

written up for the archive

Hail to the Thief came out on Capitol in the US on 10 June, a day after Britain, and most of the American and Canadian papers like it. Several connect it with the run-up to the war in Iraq, and more than one is glad the guitars are back.

The crackle at the very start of “2+2=5” is Jonny Greenwood plugging his guitar into his amp. Andrew Miller points it out in the East Bay Express, and for him the song's eruption about two minutes in shows the band's Bends-era playing has not withered. The same crackle opens Jason Bracelin's review, which ran in Cleveland Scene and again in the Houston Press (Cleveland printed “There There” as “Here Here”). For Bracelin that guitar, largely missing from Kid A and Amnesiac, sets the tone of the whole record, and the burst of noise midway through “There There” is like nothing the band have done since OK Computer.

Rolling Stone gives it four stars out of five and calls the record a product of the run-up to the Iraq war, which Thom Yorke opposed, with Orwell all through it; “2+2=5” takes its title from 1984. The magazine rates the album more tuneful than the two before it, and “Myxomatosis” the finest song anyone has written about a sick cat.

In Edmonton, Dave Johnston of Vue Weekly calls it their most unified and most inviting record since OK Computer, thinks cheering the guitars misses the point, and wonders whether the title is aimed at George W. Bush.

“A Punch-up at a Wedding” is Humberto Guida's standout in the Miami New Times, a joke at the band's own expense; the Hartford Courant calls it the most accessible song on the album and still too complicated for radio. “We Suck Young Blood” is a funeral march to Francois Marchand in Edmonton's See and a song about Hollywood vampires to Christopher O'Connor in the Phoenix New Times.

The one cool verdict is Joshua Klein's, a short second look in the Chicago Tribune after the paper's full review of 8 June. He calls the album badly sequenced, a few songs too long and rough enough in places to pass for demos.

Marchand, who warns his readers not to expect a second “Paranoid Android”, asks when Radiohead ever made a standard rock album, and tells them to stop complaining and buy it.

The reviews

#OutletDateReviewerRatingVerdict in brief
1Rolling Stone3 June 2003unsigned4 of 5Orwellian, shaped by the Iraq war; more tuneful than Kid A and Amnesiac
2Cleveland Scene4-10 June 2003Jason Bracelin–Greenwood's guitar is back; progressive and easy to like
3See (Edmonton), issue 497early June 2003Francois Marchand–Excellent; no second “Paranoid Android”
4Hartford Courant10 June 2003unsigned–Neither Britpop nor electronica; better with every play
5East Bay Express11 June 2003Andrew Miller–The loud side survives; the opening crackle is Greenwood plugging in
6Miami New Times12 June 2003Humberto Guida–“A Punch-up at a Wedding” the standout
7Phoenix New Times12 June 2003Christopher O'Connor–The prog-rock singer-songwriter album, finally mastered
8Chicago Tribune12 June 2003Joshua Klein–Badly sequenced and rough in places
9Vue Weekly (Edmonton), issue 39912-18 June 2003Dave Johnston–Their most unified record since OK Computer
10Plattentests Online (Germany)June 2003Oliver Ding9 of 10Album of the week
11The Morning Call (Allentown)14 June 2003unsigned–Their most varied album, and warmer than Kid A
12Houston Press19-25 June 2003Jason Bracelin–The Cleveland Scene review, reprinted

from the record

Go to Sleep · The promo, directed by Alex Rutterford.· Radioheadwatch on youtube →

Go to Sleep on its own page →

sources · 12

← more news from 2003

make a suggestion

a note on /news/2003/hail-to-the-thief-reviews-round-up-june-2003/

make this page better

it is
the page address goes with it.